The tragic case in Tacloban City continues to stir emotions across the country, leaving millions asking one difficult question:
When children commit horrific crimes, should society focus on punishment—or rehabilitation?
The debate intensified after Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council Executive Director Atty. Tricia Oco stated that she does not support permanently isolating the two minors accused in the case. Although the 14-year-old and 15-year-old suspects are currently being kept apart inside their rehabilitation facility, she explained that the separation is only temporary and intended for observation and safety.
According to Oco, permanently isolating a child could have serious psychological consequences. She warned that prolonged isolation may cause a young person to “forget that they are a child,” making true rehabilitation even more difficult. The goal, she explained, is not simply to punish young offenders but to help them understand the gravity of their actions, accept responsibility, and rebuild the mindset needed to become productive members of society.
That does not mean they are free or living comfortably.
The minors remain under strict supervision every day. Their movement is heavily restricted, visits are limited, and every activity is carefully monitored by professionals. Rehabilitation is a structured process designed to protect society while addressing the emotional, behavioral, and psychological needs of juvenile offenders.
Still, many people believe this approach is too lenient.
For countless citizens, crimes that shock the nation deserve severe consequences regardless of the offender’s age. They argue that justice must first honor the victims and their families, whose lives have been permanently changed. Some believe that certain crimes are so devastating that rehabilitation alone cannot satisfy society’s sense of justice.
Others see the issue differently.
ADVERTISEMENT
